Verify a filing manifest
Drop the .manifest.json, the filing's text, and the authorities it cites. Every check runs in this browser. Nothing is uploaded. Once the evidence is loaded, the checks work offline.
Sample bundle · Miami-Dade Circuit Civil · Case No. 2025-003417-CA-01
Nothing to drop yet? Use ours.
A short excerpt from a Motion to Compel in a fictional Florida matter, its provenance manifest, and the two Supreme Court of Florida opinions it quotes, as text so the quote check can run here. One quotation in the excerpt is deliberately wrong by a single word, and the manifest says so. One cited authority was in the producer's file but never opened, and the manifest says that too.
What is in the bundle
- sample.manifest.jsonthe manifest
- sample-filing.txtthe filing's text (a Motion to Compel excerpt)
- Tiara-v-Marsh-McLennan_110-So3d-399.txtTiara Condo. Ass'n v. Marsh & McLennan Cos., 110 So. 3d 399 (Fla. 2013)
- Comptech-v-Milam_753-So2d-1219.txtComptech Int'l, Inc. v. Milam Commerce Park, Ltd., 753 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 1999)
- README.txthow to run this offline
The verifier is MIT-licensed. A recipient may run it offline, with no account and no network, against these same files; the README explains how.
This sample's digest was never committed to a timestamp ledger, so the optional timestamp check below will report that no commitment exists. That is the honest answer, and a fresh proof would be pending, not confirmed.
A one-off commitment proves existence at a time, not uniqueness, completeness, or what was omitted.